Monday, June 30, 2014

Doesn't Owen Rhys Williams Prove My Point?

Last March, Anthony Chadwick took an indirect swipe at my views on "Continuing Anglicanism" and its tendency to elevate unqualified bishops, which had been echoed by another blogger, who apparently became too timid to stand by that opinion and took his post down. Chadwick defends the Continuum by saying,
If the person running this blog [meaning me?]took the trouble to look at the reality as it presents itself today, most of the “mainstream” continuing churches have got their act together. Yes, we did have the “bishops’ brawl” in the 1990′s and old Hamlett in England. Those problems have been sorted out through a greater degree of professionalism and accountability in the Episcopate. Can no credit be given for learning lessons and making institutional reforms where they were needed?
Hey, all I'm doing here is looking at the reality as it presents itself today and, like a good Aristotelian/Aquinas-influenced Christian, applying my God-given reason to understand it. In April 2013, the ACA consecrated a Bishop for whom I can find no evidence that he graduated from a four-year college, or received an MDiv from an accredited seminary. These are presumed to be the minimal qualifications for an ordained minister in a respectable US denomination. It is a principle of reason and justice that if the ACA will not provide this evidence, when it is normally provided as a matter of course, it may be assumed not to exist.

I will be delighted to correct this record if the ACA, "Bishop" Williams, Anthony Chadwick, or anyone else, will tell me what Williams's qualifications actually are.

Who Is The Rt Rev Owen Rhys Williams? -- II

I raised this question late last year when I first noted that he'd been made episcopal visitor to the ACA's moribund Diocese of the West. At the time, I was puzzled that there's no official biography, when this is simply normal practice for a rector or bishop in any denomination. It continues to raise questions for me.

Priests leave digital trails. They should; they preside over weddings and funerals, which make the local news. They get into the news for other reasons: the parish announces when they arrive, or when they're promoted. Sometimes something newsworthy but bad happens, as we've seen with Robert Bowman and Anthony Morello. They deliver invocations at community events; they join committees. All this comes up with Google. The puzzling thing about Owen Williams is how little comes up: other than the entries on this blog, there are just the stenographically unquestioning blurbs about his consecration in April 2013 on the usual vapid Anglo-Catholic blogs. Nothing else. Nothing. Try it!

One additional snippet of biographical data now on the St Mary of the Angels new clergy page raises another question: there's a dog here that didn't bark. "Bishop Williams was raised in southern California where his father was rector of St. Nicholas Parish, Encino." Indeed: the Rev. Evan Rowland Williams was Rector of St. Nicholas Episcopal Church in Encino from 1965 until his premature death at age 59 in 1987. And he proves my point: more than 25 years later, unlike his son, this priest has a digital trail. He served, for example, on a committee to "work for the preservation of unity within the Episcopal Church" during the decision-making process that led to the ordination of women. (Lot of good that did, of course.) He had an extensive obituary in the Los Angeles Times.

But, other than that he made Bishop in the ACA last year, what his dad did is all the St Mary's vestry is willing to reveal about him. And the dog that didn't bark is this: nepotism is common in Anglican denominations. From time immemorial, a good path to career advancement for priests has been to marry a bishop's daughter. More recently, another path has been simply to be a bishop's daughter. Fathers in the clergy are also in a good position to promote their sons' careers: a word to the bishop can smooth the path to postulancy for holy orders, obtain a bishop's letter of endorsement to a good seminary, put the boy in the way of a vicar or priest-in-charge position, or move a rector in a prestigious parish to hire the boy for a vacant curacy.

As far as I can see, none of this happened to Evan's boy Owen, when Evan was apparently in a very good position to make such things happen. Owen, born in 1954, was 33 the year his father died. In 1975, when he was 21, his father was 48 and robust, with plenty of contacts among his elite colleagues. But there's simply no record of any start to a clerical career for Evan's boy Owen at the usual age.

As I mentioned last year, the only other -- the only other -- public biographical detail the ACA has seen fit to provide about Evan's boy Owen is Brian Marsh's remark, "Bishop Owen Williams is known to most of the diocese from his years at Saint Mark’s in Portland, Oregon." Public records show addresses for Owen Rhys Williams in the Portland, Oregon area in the late 1990s, when St Mark's Portland was still an ACA parish, during the time of its contentious relationship with Louis Falk's abrasive, heavy-drinker protégé Robin Connors. However, Evan's boy Owen appears to have been only a lay member of that parish. Any priestly formation that would have led to his ordination in the ACA appears, from anything I can find, to have taken place after that time, when Owen would have been nearly 50 years old.

What prevented Owen Williams from considering holy orders in his twenties, when his father would have been able to help his career? A lack of a four-year degree? I can find no such reference, in any case. Under what circumstances did Owen Williams attend seminary, if in fact he ever did? (The Ven Frederick Rivers never put much stock in seminaries himself, of course.) Again, I can pull name after name of Episcopal and Anglican clergy I've known and respected over the years, and I typically find an official bio and photo at their parish web sites, including the name of their undergraduate institution, their seminary, and details of their clerical careers.

There is nothing like that for The Rt Rev Owen Rhys Williams. Can anyone -- including Bishop Williams himself -- fill in any of these gaps?

Sunday, June 29, 2014

So What's Going On Now?

St Mary's -- or at least, its rump unelected vestry -- has redone its web page and made what appears to be a non-announcement announcement: the parish now has a clergy page, with a "Pastor". We learn:
The Right Reverend Owen Williams is the Pastor of the parish. Bishop Williams was raised in southern California where his father was rector of St. Nicholas Parish, Encino. He was consecrated a bishop in April 2013 and has been serving since that time as Suffragan Bishop of the ACA Diocese of the Northeast and Episcopal Visitor to the Diocese of the West.
This is the sort of muddled opacity that we're come to expect from the St Mary's rump and the ACA. Normally, "Pastor" is an informal synonym for Rector. I don't believe there is a formal canonical designation for a "Pastor". As far as I can see, the Canons of the ACA, while they mention a "pastoral relationship", do not designate a position of Pastor -- they mention only Rector or Minister. Other formal titles for the senior priest in a parish in Anglicanism include Priest-in-Charge, Interim Rector, or Vicar.

As far as I can see, the designation of "Pastor" here can only be deliberate. In Anglicanism, a Rector is called by a vestry with the assent of a Bishop. A Priest-in-Charge or an Interim Rector is designated by a Bishop, in consultation with the vestry. If Williams is either of these, why shouldn't this be made clear? A Vicar is appointed by a Bishop to supervise a mission, which St Mary of the Angels currently is not, although given its actual membership, it probably should be designated as such.

However, according to the same clergy page,

The Venerable Frederick Rivers is the Archdeacon and Vicar General of the ACA Diocese of the West and current rector of the parish.

As far as I can see from the parish home page, Bishop Williams's "first mass" is scheduled for August 31, 2014. This strongly implies a new and ongoing relationship -- it appears to mean that Williams will be on site and celebrating mass weekly. Let me see if I can piece together what this all means:

  • Williams is not the Rector of the parish. Frederick Rivers is the Rector.
  • Williams had been designated episcopal visitor to the Diocese of the West on August 8, 2013.
  • However, on March 30, 2014, Presiding Bishop Brian Marsh himself made an episcopal visit to St Mary of the Angels.
  • Although Williams is a Bishop and the episcopal visitor, it appears that the "first mass" scheduled for August 31 is not an episcopal visit.
  • Williams will be presiding at St Mary of the Angels as neither a Bishop, nor a Rector, nor an Interim Priest, nor as a Priest-in-Charge, but as a "Pastor".
I have no idea what sort of employment agreement this implies. Nor can I understand how the lines of authority are supposed to go. Rivers presumably reports to Williams if Williams is episcopal visitor to the diocese, and Rivers is just a vicar general -- as far as I can see, if things were working the way they ought, Williams should tell Rivers what to do, or Rivers should be acting under Williams's delegated authority. However, if Rivers is Rector of the parish and Williams is just licensed to celebrate mass there, Williams reports to Rivers, and Rivers can fire Williams at any time. (If I were to speculate, I would guess that this all means that, irrespective of who is called what, Brian Marsh still has the whole thing under his thumb.)

The head spins. As we've seen, though, this is business as usual for the ACA -- muddled lines of authority, extra-canonical actions, opaque communication. I thought briefly about e-mailing Williams with my questions about this arrangement, but nobody in the ACA has ever replied to my e-mails.